Where Science and Buddhism Meet - Part 1 - Buddhachannel
Now more than ever, Buddhists are using scientific tools and scientists are using Buddhist wisdom to uncover truths about the universe. Here. Here is a very partial list of resources: Wave/Particle Duality — Tao of Physics – pg 67, Quantum Enigma — pg Buddhism and science have increasingly been discussed as compatible, and Buddhism has entered into the science and religion dialogue. The case is made .
I believe there is a wave of frequence of reality that we don't perceive just by means of the experience called objectivity, but probably by the mixing of seudo subjectivity and seudo objectivity.
That is allowed by means only of trance called "mystique". Third, so Rusell said it or not? Because a misquote is when a person didn't said something, but descontextualized are all quotes.Where Science and Buddhism Meet PART 1
Try the change of perception caused by meditation and then oppose. But whithout knowing saying something is like being faithfull to science in the same way to being faithfull to the "mumbo jumbo budhist", it could be like the "mumbo jumbo scientist". I think this part is nicely described in Theravada.
Buddhism and science - Wikipedia
I believe that Buddhists and scientists have a lot in common. That's not to say that the content and goals of both are exactly the same. Science does not concern itself with philosophical matters such as free-will, the existence of a soul or the meaning of life. Yet, I think that any real Buddhist I do not consider myself as one would take the lengthy and interesting debate here, as a perfect example of something that contradicts the real spirit of their philosophy, the same as any real scientists also, unfortunately can't claim to be one would feel.
I think that another common trait of real Buddhists and scientists is openness to the changing world that they constantly explore.
Many established Zen and Tao quotes of mainstream personalities, such as the comparison of the mind to a mirror that has to be constantly polished, or the need of "killing the Buddha" once you meet him on the road, best demonstrates the need to self exploration and turning every stone instead of taking others' theories for granted or spending time on lecturing to others. I am talking about "real" Buddhists and "real" scientists since in both dogmas and sticking to the old and known theories are part of the culture.
But in both the real work is being done by the real seekers, who do not care about how they are being perceived.
What the discussion here demonstrates in my humble opinion is that we are all a bunch of wise guys using the same old tricks and feel great about it, instead of being a little more curious and humble. Judging by the strong opinions here, all of us can lecture about quantum physics 5 seconds after being awoke from a deep sleep, but we have also meditated for an average of 28 years and know about Buddhism more than the Buddha himself. This view was apparently regarded with considerable skepticism at the time, but Buddhist concepts have indeed made most in-roads in the psychological sciences.
Some modern scientific theories, such as Rogerian psychologyshow strong parallels with Buddhist thought. Some of the most interesting work on the relationship between Buddhism and science is being done in the area of comparison between Yogacara theories regarding the store consciousness and modern evolutionary biology, especially DNA.
The "stream of consciousness" is given various names throughout the many languages of Buddhadharma discourse but in English is generally known as " Mindstream ". Goenka describes Buddhadharma as a 'pure science of mind and matter'.
Buddhism is a combination of both speculative and scientific philosophy.
It advocates the scientific method and pursues that to a finality that may be called Rationalistic. In it are to be found answers to such questions of interest as: Of them, which is of greater importance?
Buddhism and science
Is the universe moving towards a goal? What is man's position? Is there living that is noble? Its conquests are those of the mind.